Report claims Expo failure

January 28th, 2012

Report claims Expo failure

via news-leader.com

Inadequate facilities and the lack of a connecting hotel have been cited as reasons Springfieldʼs Expo Center isnʼt doing more business.

In a report distributed to City Council on Tuesday, city staff said John Q. Hammons Hotelsʼ management of the center has fallen short of expectations, as well.

“Staff does not believe the Exposition Center has been marketed or used to its maximum potential,” the report says, noting Hammons Hotels has failed to submit required reports on a regular basis.

The memo, drafted in response to questions posed by Councilman Tom Bieker, said the problems likely fall short of justifying termination of the Hammonsʼ management contract, which runs through at least 2028 and could be extended a decade past that.

City Council voted Nov. 28 to buy back a tract of land next to the Expo Center after Hammons failed to build a connecting hotel as promised.

Echoing a concern contained in an August consultantʼs report, Bieker said finding another developer to build a hotel could be difficult if Hammons continues to manage the Expo Center. He asked whether the city had reason to cancel the contract and what the consequences of doing so would be.

An answer to the latter part of the question is still being drafted, said Mary Lilly Smith, the cityʼs economic development director. The memo distributed Tuesday focuses on the first part.

“We donʼt think thereʼs been a material breach” of the contract, said Smith who worked with Phil Broyles and Jonathan Gano from Public Works and Convention & Visitors Bureau President Tracy Kimberlin to draft the memo.

Still, “we think there are some things that could potentially be better addressed,” Smith said.

Shortcomings mentioned in the report included Hammonsʼ failure to adequately market the facility and failure to coordinate with the CVB to the extent required in the contract.

The memo also notes that Hammons typically has turned over various financial reports and other documentation only when asked, rather than submitting them on the schedule outlined in the contract.

Changes being made

Justin Harris, a senior vice president and spokesman for Hammons Hotels, did not respond Wednesday to a message seeking comment.

Smith said the company has agreed to do a better job of reporting to the city and working with the CVB to market the facility.

But, as noted in the report, some issues are beyond Hammonsʼ control, she said.

In addition to high utility costs and inadequate facilities, Hammons staff “pointed out that there are some things that may be inconsistent just on their face in the operating agreement,” Smith said.

Different provisions in the agreement require Hammons to try to maximize business while at the same time operating “at least on a break-even basis.”

“They shouldnʼt be losing money” hosting shows, Smith said, but hosting shows at a loss might bring in more business.

The Catch-22 in the contract is a consequence of the way the Expo Center was financed, Smith said.

“It was smart on the one hand because the city has no financial responsibility,” she said.

The city issued bonds to build the Expo Center, but the debt is being repaid solely with special taxes assessed on nearby Hammons properties.

“We own the facility, but Mr. Hammons is responsible for all of the debt service on the bonds and he is responsible for any shortfall,” she said. “But he has no incentive to discount the space or to bring in shows that may be money losers on the Expo Center side but have greater economic benefit to the community.”

Councilman reaction

Bieker said Wednesday heʼs only had time to skim the report, but thinks it will help foster improvements.

“I think it was an honest look into what has been happening there,” he said. “Now we know what the deficiencies are … If we can tackle them and correct them and keep on that path, then good. If not, then we need to address that again.”

Kimberlin, from the visitors bureau, said he thinks better coordination with Hammons and other actions outlined in the memo “hopefully will pay dividends.”

A significant increase in business at the Expo Center likely will require additional changes and a larger investment, he said.

“As the consultantʼs report pointed out, the Expo Center is an exhibit hall. It is not a convention center,” Kimberlin said. “I think if we wind up getting a true convention complex over there, changes to the operating agreement certainly would be in order.”

Kimberlin said “itʼs way too early in the process to say” how or when the contract might be amended.

“I think we know we have a problem …,” he said. “How itʼs addressed will depend a lot on what happens with the total complex, whether another hotel developer comes in.”

Another study coming

The Expo Centerʼs ability to attract convention business to Springfield has been a focus of several recent reports.

In a study released in August, consultant Rob Hunden described the Expo Center, which opened in 2003, as underused and ill-equipped to compete with newer convention centers in the region.

Hunden said Springfield needs to “go big or go home” when it comes to investing in a convention center complex.

His initial report, paid for by the city in partnership with John Q. Hammons Hotels and the Springfield Convention & Visitors Bureau, suggested as much as $55 million in public funding might be needed.

CVB President Tracy Kimberlin said a follow-up report analyzing the benefit the city might gain from that investment is almost complete and could be released “hopefully in the next several days.”

Consultant evaluates city’s Expo Center

January 21st, 2012

Consultant evaluates city’s Expo Center

Written by Amos Bridges News-Leader
9:24 AM, Aug. 3, 2011|

As much as $55 million in public funding is needed to make Springfield convention facilities competitive but more study is needed to know whether the investment would pay off.

Those were among the conclusions consultant Rob Hunden presented to City Council and other local officials during a lunch meeting Tuesday at John Q. Hammons’ University Plaza Hotel.

Hammons’ company, in partnership with the city and the Springfield Convention and Visitors Bureau, paid Hunden $39,000 to evaluate the city’s Expo Center and determine the best use for the 1.7-acre lot just east.

The city sold the tract to Hammons in 2008 with the promise that the hotelier would build an Embassy Suites connected to the center. Hammons’ failure to do so means the city can buy back the land for $1, but officials agreed to wait for Hunden’s report before making a decision.

Mayor Jim O’Neal said Tuesday he thinks council should make that decision soon. “The ball’s back in council’s court, we need to decide what to do,” said O’Neal, who thinks “it’s clear (the city) should buy it back.”

“No matter who owns it, I’m of a mind that that piece of land needs to sit still right now,” the mayor said. “There’s no rush to judgment or sense of urgency now.”

O’Neal said he thinks the recommended investment “just doesn’t seem feasible in this economy.”

CVB President Tracy Kimberlin and City Manager Greg Burris acknowledged the funding likely is beyond the city’s reach right now, but said they want the city and other stakeholders to continue the discussion.

“We know that nothing is going to happen any time soon,” Kimberlin said. But by doing nothing, Springfield will continue losing ground to Branson and other cities that have or plan to build new facilities.

“Staying where we are today, we are in effect packing up.”

Even if money is not available right away, plans could be developed, Burris said.

“This could literally be years of work before it gets to the point of spending much money.”

As a next step, he and Kimberlin recommended signing a new contract with Hunden for a follow-up study evaluating the benefit — in new jobs, spending and
tax revenue — the city could expect in return for investing in the Expo Center.

Kimberlin said the CVB and Springfield Area Chamber of Commerce each have agreed to pay for 1/3 of the $15,000 cost of the study if the city will pay the
remainder.

Burris said Tuesday that — seeing no opposition from City Council — he likely will authorize the expense.

“We know how much (the improvements) will cost … now we need to see the other side of the equation,” Burris said. “For us to invest $5,000 to avoid making a $50 million mistake, I think it’s worth it.”

To read the consultant’s report, go to News-Leader.com.

Recommended upgrades

If Springfield wants to compete for convention business, consultant Rob Hunden recommended a number of upgrades to the existing Expo Center and nearby
facilities.

In addition to an estimated $53 million in private investment, the improvements would require between $24 million and $55 million in public investment, as well, according to his report.

Suggested improvements include:
» Construction of a 240-room convention hotel on the former arena site east of the Expo Center.
Private cost: $26 million
Public cost: $5.2 million to $16 million

» Renovation of the Expo Center, including demolition of the old Sears portion of the building (to be replaced with ballrooms, meeting rooms and a kitchen) and construction of pedestrian connections to University Plaza and the new hotel on the old arena site.
Private cost: $0
Public funding: $10.2 million to $17 million

» Renovation of University Plaza Hotel and Convention Center, including an upgrade to a branded hotel.
Private cost: $9.5 million
Public cost: $3.5 million to $8.5 million

» Development of additional restaurants, retail and entertainment venues in the immediate area.
Private cost: $13.1 million
Public cost: $1.8 million to $7.7 million

» Construction of a parking garage with restaurant and retail space next to the Discovery Center.
Private cost: $5 million
Public cost: $3.8 million to $6.3 million

Pacers to stay in Indianapolis for another three years

January 21st, 2012

Pacers to stay in Indianapolis for another three years

13 July 2010 | Posted in Hosting, Basketball | By Nick Forrester

The National Basketball Association’s (NBA) Indiana Pacers have signed a three-year agreement with the Indianapolis Capital Improvement Board (CIB) to keep them in the city of Indianapolis for at least another three years through the 2012-13 season.

The deal will cost US$33.5 million in taxpayer money over the three years. US$10 million a year will be used to help operate Conseco Fieldhouse, which is reported to cost US$18 million to run. The city will also pay US$3.5 million for improvements to Conseco, but has the potential of increasing to US$4.7 million.

“After tough and deliberative negotiations, we have reached an agreement to preserve the viability of our downtown economic engine, keep the Pacers as the Conseco Fieldhouse prime tenant, preserve the thousands of jobs impacted by Fieldhouse activity, and maintain the millions of dollars in tax revenue generated by this same activity,” said Indianapolis Mayor Gregory Ballard. “Our charge was to preserve the city’s downtown economic vitality while protecting taxpayers across Indianapolis. The agreement we’ve reached achieves this and, very importantly, involves no additional tax increase.”

In May, the CIB released a report produced by Hunden Strategic Partners (HSP), a well-known real estate development advisory practice specializing in destination assets, which showed a Pacers net contribution to the city of US$55 million in economic activity each year. If the Pacers were to leave Indianapolis, it is anticipated that Indianapolis’ governmental bodies would be directly impacted by roughly US$18 million.

NBA talks break down, preseason games wiped out

January 21st, 2012

NBA talks break down, preseason games wiped out

IBJ Staff and Associated Press October 4, 2011

NBA Commissioner David Stern floated it as an idea more than a firm proposal: a 50-50 revenue split. Even so, the union’s reply was unequivocal.

“They said, ‘We can’t do it.’” according to Stern.

And with that, the remainder of the preseason was lost and the first two weeks of the regular season moved to the brink of cancellation.

The National Basketball Association shelved the rest of its exhibition schedule Tuesday and will wipe out the first two weeks of the regular season if there is no labor agreement by Monday.

The Indiana Pacers will lose eight preseason games to the lockout, including at least three games at home.

Three preseason games already had been called off, including at least two home games.

“We were not able to make the progress that we hoped we could make and we were not able to continue the negotiations,” Stern said after nearly fours of talks between owners and players ended without gaining ground on a new deal.

No further meetings are scheduled, making it even more likely the league will lose games to a work stoppage for the first time since 1998-99, when the season was reduced to 50 games.

If the season is canceled, Indianapolis stands to lose about $55 million in economic activity, according to a 2010 study done by Chicago-based Hunden Strategic Partners for the city’s Capital Improvement Board, which owns Conseco Fieldhouse.

Stern and Deputy Commissioner Adam Silver said owners offered players a 50-50 split of basketballrelated income. That’s below the 57 percent that players were guaranteed under the previous collective bargaining agreement, but more than the 47 percent union officials said was formally proposed to them.

The only numbers that matter now, however, are the millions that stand to be lost when arenas go dark. “The damage will be enormous,” Silver said.

Players had offered to reduce their BRI guarantee to 53 percent, which they said would have given owners back more than $1 billion over six years. They say they won’t cut it further, at least for now.

And they insist the 50-50 concept wasn’t an even split, because it would have come after the league had already deducted $350 million off the top.

“Today was not the day for us to get this done,” players’ association president Derek Fisher said. “We were not able to get close enough to close the gap.”

With superstars like Kobe Bryant, Paul Pierce and Kevin Garnett standing behind him, union executive director Billy Hunter said the players’ proposal would have made up at least $200 million per season — a sizable chunk of the $300 million owners said they lost last season.

“Our guys have indicated a willingness to lose games,” Hunter said.

The sides are also still divided on the salary-cap structure.

Training camps were postponed and 43 preseason games scheduled for Oct. 9-15 were canceled on Sept. 24. Both sides said they felt pressure to work toward a deal with deadlines looming before more cancellations would be necessary.

Stern said the owners had removed their demand for a hard salary cap, were no longer insisting on salary rollbacks, and would have given players the right to opt out of a 10-year agreement after seven years. But the money split was always going to be the biggest hurdle in these negotiations, with owners insistent on
the ability to turn a profit after the league said 22 of its 30 teams lost money last season.

“We want to and have been willing to negotiate, but we find ourselves at a point today where we in some ways anticipated or expected to be, faced with a lockout that may jeopardize portions if not all of our season,” Fisher said.

After hardly budging off their original proposal for 18 months, owners finally increased their offer to players from 46 to 47 percent of BRI. It was then that the top negotiators discussed the 50-50 concept, and while Stern sounded disappointed that it didn’t work, Silver was more frustrated.

“I am not going to get a good night sleep,” he said. “After this afternoon’s session, I would say I’m personally very disappointed. I thought that we should have continued negotiating today and I thought that there was potentially common ground on a 50-50 deal. I think it makes sense, it sounds like a partnership. There still would have been a lot of negotiating to do on the system elements, but I’m personally very disappointed.”

On what both sides stressed was an important day, the owners’ entire 11-man labor relations committee came to New York to meet with 11 players. They could still work something out before Monday’s deadline, but neither side sounded optimistic.

“Right now, we had our committees, we gave it a really good run, and it didn’t work,” Stern said. Hunter said the union would hold regional meetings with its players, set up workout centers and help in other ways. And many players — including Bryant, who has been in talks with an Italian team — will
have to decide if they want to explore playing overseas.

And without a deal, the battle could go to the courts. Hunter said the union would have to consider decertification, and on Tuesday a federal court judge scheduled a hearing for Nov. 2 to hear arguments in the league’s lawsuit against the players seeking a declaration that the lockout doesn’t violate antitrust
laws.

All things both sides hoped to avoid Tuesday.

“It wasn’t to be, and we don’t have any plans right now,” Stern said.

Loss of Pacers season would deal blow to CIB, state revenue

January 21st, 2012

Loss of Pacers season would deal blow to CIB, state revenue

Scott Olson , Anthony Schoetle October 11, 2011

Taxing bodies and downtown businesses are bracing for an economic body blow with the crushing impact of a Roy Hibbert pick now that cancellation of the Indiana Pacers’ entire 2011-2012 season is a real possibility.

NBA Commissioner David Stern canceled the first two weeks of the regular season on Monday—including the Pacers first seven games—after owners and players were unable to reach a new labor deal and end the lockout. Failure to reach a deal soon could emperil the entire season.

If that happens, the Capital Improvement Board might lose $1.5 million in food-and-beverage taxes, and the state could miss out on $3.5 million in Professional Sports Development Area funds, CIB Chief Financial Office Dan Huge said at Monday afternoon’s CIB meeting. The PSDA captures state sales tax
revenue generated by downtown venues, including Conseco Fieldhouse.

Huge did have some good news to report at Monday’s meeting. He said that through August, CIB is running $13 million over budget, largely because of improving tax revenue.

CIB’s proposed 2012 budget up for approval by the City-County Council on Oct. 17 is $77.5 million, up $4.4 million from this year.

Board member Michael McQuillen, who also is a City-County Councilor, doesn’t think the entire NBA season will be canceled. But if it is, he wants to ensure CIB is prepared to absorb the shortfall.

“I wouldn’t say the budget is rosy, but it’s solid,” he said. “I think [CIB is] doing a good enough job where the loss won’t be devastating, but $5 million [in CIB and state revenue] is $5 million.”

Life without a Pacers season has been on the minds of city leaders for several years, as team executives complained of multimillion-dollar losses and hinted that the franchise might need to move elsewhere.

In 2010, the CIB agreed to subsidize the Pacers’s operation of Conseco Fieldhouse to the tune of $33.5 million over three years. Some opponents of the funding argued that the team, founded here in 1967, should fold or move to another city if it couldn’t be financially viable on its own.

“I guess it’s a case of being careful what you wish for,” Mark Rosentraub, a former IUPUI dean who has written two books about professional sports operations, said in an August interview with IBJ. “If Indianapolis loses the Pacers even for a season, it won’t be at all good economically for the city.”

Losing the team for a year would wipe out about $55 million in economic activity, according to a 2010 study done by Chicago-based Hunden Strategic Partners for the CIB.

The impact would stem from less money being spent at restaurants, bars and hotels, as well as to decreases in the Pacers’ payroll and diminished tax revenue for units of government.

“There’s going to be a real economic hit, and we’re going to feel that pretty quickly once we start losing games,” CIB President Ann Lathrop said earlier this summer.

“This city is also going to lose out on some significant branding opportunities (through television broadcasts and media mentions) without the Pacers and I think a sense of community pride,” Lathrop added. “It’s a lot more than just money.”

Downtown businesses have been bracing for a financial hit for months, anticipating a shortened or eliminated 2011-2012 season.

“For us, it would be a huge loss,” said Troy Gregory, general manager of Mo’s, a steakhouse a block north of Conseco Fieldhouse, earlier this summer. “There are games, including those when the Pacers play teams like Miami, Chicago, Boston or Los Angeles, where we do at least as much business as we
would during a Colts home game.”

On big game nights, Gregory said revenue more than quadruples compared with a normal night.

“It would be a really big impact on us, and we’re far from alone,” Gregory said. “We’re hoping games don’t get canceled, but from what we hear, it doesn’t sound good.”

Downtown restaurant owners interviewed by IBJ estimated they each could lose as much as $500,000 without a Pacers season.

Parking lot operators also would take a big hit, with several around the arena saying they’d lose from $25,000 to $100,000 depending on the size of the lot and proximity to the arena, which dictates rates.

While hotels generally don’t see a lot of business from Pacers games, the Conrad does. The high-end hotel on Washington Street downtown has contracts with 23 of the NBA’s 29 teams that play here.

“It’s a good piece of business for us, and naturally, we’d hate to lose it,” said Greg Tinsley, the hotel’s general manager.

Tinsley said each team uses about 40 hotel rooms. The cancellation of an entire regular NBA season would cost the Conrad about 1,600 room nights. Though Tinsley wouldn’t say what the financial hit would be, it would likely be more than $500,000 after tallying room rates, meals and other charges.

The Pacers were scheduled to play 41 regular season home games and four pre-season games at Conseco Fieldhouse in the 2011-2012 season. So far, all preseason games have been canceled, as well as the Pacers’ first seven games.

Including its playoff games last year, the Pacers drew about 620,000 people through the turnstiles in the 2010-2011 season.

Regardless of how many games are canceled, the CIB in January will give the Pacers the second of three $10 million installments to offset Conseco Fieldhouse operating expenses. The payment is related to building expenses at Conseco Fieldhouse, not operating the team, Lathrop said.

[UPDATED] CIB to Vote on Pacers Deal

January 21st, 2012

[UPDATED] CIB to Vote on Pacers Deal

InsideINdianaBusiness.com Report

Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard says the agreement was
reached using no public tax funding and will ensure the downtown
area will retain its ability to attract the public, businesses and
conventions.

The deal to keep the Indiana Pacers in Indianapolis for at least
the next three years will go to a vote by members of the Capital
Improvement Board Friday. It calls for the CIB to provide $10
million in each of the next three seasons to the Pacers to
operate Conseco Fieldhouse.

Source: Inside INdiana Business

Press Release

INDIANAPOLIS – The Capital Improvement Board (CIB) of Managers of Marion County and Pacers Sports & Entertainment (PS&E) reached a 3-year agreement on Monday to keep the Pacers in Indianapolis for the near future.

The agreement will go before the CIB for a vote on July 16. If approved, the agreement will exist in conjunction with the current lease agreement, and the CIB will provide $10 million to PS&E for operating expenses for each of the next three seasons. PS&E will maintain operations of the Fieldhouse.

“After tough and deliberative negotiations, we have reached an agreement to preserve the viability of our downtown economic engine, keep the Pacers as the Conseco Fieldhouse prime tenant, preserve the thousands of jobs impacted by Fieldhouse activity, and maintain the millions of dollars in tax revenue generatedby this same activity,” said Indianapolis Mayor Gregory Ballard.

“Our charge was to preserve the city’s downtown economic vitality while protecting taxpayers across Indianapolis. The agreement we?ve reached achieves this and, very importantly, involves no additional tax increase.”

Complete terms of the agreement show a scaled repayment plan in which the obligation of PS&E to repay the $30 million will be reduced for each season the Pacers continue to play at Conseco Fieldhouse, concluding with a zero balance in 2019.

The funds will come from the CIB budget, which continues to improve in both holding the line on expenses and revenue growth -the additional 1 percent hotel tax was increased in 2009, the additional Professional Sports Development Authority (PSDA) tax passed by the General Assembly in 2009, and the availability of State Loans of $9 million per year in 2009, 2010 and 2011.

“We achieved our major goals in keeping the Pacers’ huge economic impact here in downtown Indianapolis, avoiding the entire expense of operating Conseco Fieldhouse without a marquee tenant, avoiding the devastating blow to the economic development and convention business that losing the team would have created, and crafting an agreement that is within the CIB’s budget,” said Ann Lathrop, president of the CIB.

The short-term agreement will allow time for the impacts of a planned new National Basketball Association collective bargaining agreement and expanded CIB financial picture, including an expanded Convention Center and other factors, to take shape in advance of a long-term agreement.

In May, the CIB released a report produced by Hunden Strategic Partners (HSP), a well-known real estate development advisory practice specializing in destination assets, which showed a Pacers net contribution to the city of $55 million in economic activity each year and 909 permanent, full-time equivalent jobs. If the Pacers were to leave Indianapolis, it is anticipated that Indianapolis?

governmental bodies would be directly impacted by roughly $18 million.

The CIB is the public agency that manages several downtown facilities including Lucas Oil Stadium, the Indiana Convention Center, Conseco Fieldhouse and Victory Field, among others. For more information on the CIB, please visit their website at www.capitalimprovementboard.org

Source: Capital Improvement Board

Lansdowne Park

January 21st, 2012

Lansdowne Park

City followed Lansdowne critic’s advice in studying
redevelopment deal, lawyers tells judge

BY MOHAMMED ADAM, THE OTTAWA CITIZEN JUNE 29, 2011

OTTAWA — The City of Ottawa was so determined to conduct the redevelopment Lansdowne Park in an open, honest and transparent manner it followed the advice of one of the plan’s principal critics on how to evaluate the financial projections, an Ottawa court heard Wednesday.

Peter Doody, the lawyer who is appearing for the city, said that when Carleton University businessbprofessor Ian Lee told council in the winter of 2009 that the best course was to conduct anbindependent third party review of the financial projections of the Ottawa Sports and EntertainmentbGroup’s plan, city manager Kent Kirkpatrick took the advice to heart and acted on it.

Doody said Kirkpatrick asked the city’s auditor general who is an independent watchdog, to conduct such a review. The auditor general, in turn, asked Lee for advice on which firm to hire to help him.

Lee suggested the Chicago consulting firm Hunden Strategic Partners and they were hired, Doody said.

At the council meeting in question on Nov. 12, 2009, Lee was asked by former councillor Alex Cullen for advice on how to evaluate the finances. Lee responded that his criticism of council was that it had not hired a financial accounting firm from outside Ottawa, or even Canada, to do “full diligence” on the OSEG numbers.

“Let’s bring in an independent third party … accounting firm from the U.S., from New York City or San Francisco, or one of the big cities where there are a lot of capital projects, who can run through the numbers and give you an independent, arm-length, objective analysis so that you are not believing me, or you or some other critic,” transcripts of the city meeting show Lee as saying.

Doody said that’s exactly what happened and the auditor general used Hunden’s advice to help write a report that found the assumptions underpinning the financial projects to be sound. The Hunden report, like others that the auditor general receives, is confidential.

The Friends of Lansdowne, a citizens’ group opposed to the OSEG redevelopment plan, has taken the city to court alleging that it acted illegally on several grounds, including bad faith, providing illegal subsidies to OSEG and violating municipal and provincial law. The group wants the court to quash the Lansdowne Partnership Plan and have the city start the redevelopment again.

But Doody said the city’s action in response to Lee shows that it conducted itself properly, listened to a variety of views and suggestions and made its decision in good faith. There is no indication throughout the process that the city acted unlawfully or illegally, Doody said.

Doody’s theme on the second day of his submissions was of a democratically elected council performing its lawful duties. He argued that Justice Charles Hackland, who is hearing the case, should be wary of second-guessing it.

He said council, in its wisdom, had decided that the redevelopment of Lansdowne has to be linked with a CFL franchise to reduce the drain on the city’s finances.

Having made that decision, council proceeded to determine the best way to achieve its goal, and when OSEG made its proposal, he told the court, the city felt it had found the right partner.

The Friends of Lansdowne contend that the city stacked the deck in such a way that it disqualified other potential bidders, leaving the door open for OSEG. Doody rejected the argument that sole sourcing the project showed bad faith and was illegal. He said the law allows sole-sourcing in exceptional circumstances, and the Lansdowne redevelopment was one of those unique circumstances. He said it was not unreasonable for council, which wanted to redevelop Lansdowne and have a CFL team to pick OSEG because it fit the bill perfectly. It was “reasonable” Doody said, to conclude that only OSEG could do the job.

Doody also attempted to rebut a major criticism that the city may have withheld or hidden documents. He said under city policy, e-mails are kept by staff for 90 days and then deleted but the documents may still be held electronically in the system. But after 180 days they disappear. He said some of the records may have fallen victim to this policy. The problem, he said, is “endemic” and is not confined to the Lansdowne redevelopment.

The hearing continues and the judge has indicated he wants it to end Thursday.

© Copyright (c) The Ottawa Citizen

Unusual North of South deal leaves taxpayers vulnerable

January 19th, 2012

Unusual North of South deal leaves taxpayers vulnerable

Cory Schouten April 16, 2011

Proceeds from a refinancing of bonds that paid for road improvements near Lilly Technology Center will help fund North of South.

(IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

The $156 million North of South project is a complicated, risky and potentially transformative bet on
downtown.

It’s also a no-brainer of a deal, at least for Buckingham Cos., the developer, and Eli Lilly and Co., which owns the 15 acres of surface parking lots set to be developed along South Street east of Delaware Street.

That’s because taxpayers—acting as the project’s bankers—are shouldering most of the risk in the no-bid deal, while the potential for a tangible profit rests squarely in private hands, a review of documents and interviews with people familiar with the project show.

Buckingham stands to cash in every step of the way, earning fees for all three of its divisions—development, construction and property management. And Lilly gains a new amenity for its corporate campus while cashing out of a 20-year-old arrangement with the city that required the company to make periodic payments on infrastructure bonds.

Taxpayers are putting up nearly every dollar used to build the apartment, hotel and retail project, chiefly by loaning $86 million raised from the sale of municipal bonds. All without the city’s landing any job commitments, charging the developer a spread above the city’s cost of capital as any banker would, or installing a mechanism for taxpayers to enjoy some upside if the deal succeeds.

The benefits to the city are a larger tax base, a plugged hole in the downtown streetscape, and a powerful employment driver for the corporate campuses that surround the property, city officials say.

They point to a study showing an estimated five-year economic impact for North of South of $350 million, and a conservative loan-to-value ratio of about 70 percent that gives taxpayers a good shot at recouping most of their investment.

Devil in the details

Several developers who spoke with IBJ on condition of anonymity and are generally supportive of public-private deals said the North of South arrangement upends the traditional risk-reward calculation for land development. They say any developer would have jumped at the deal the privately held Buckingham achieved.

“All the developer has is upside!” one said. “The taxpayer has all the risk.”

A 90-page project agreement provides insight into some of the risks. City officials declined to share the project agreement until they finalized the details and the City-County Council approved the plans in mid-March.

Buckingham, which has its headquarters at Ninth and Meridian streets downtown, broke ground on the project last month.

A few details found in the agreement and other documents:
• A $15 million cash contribution credited to Lilly is more complicated than it appears on the surface. Because Lilly’s Technology Center did not generate enough in property taxes to service the debt on a package of infrastructure improvements the city approved in the late 1980s, Lilly had to cover the shortfalls. Now, the city is paying back the pharmaceutical giant, and Lilly is reinvesting the proceeds in North of South.

The city also gives credit to Lilly for contributing the 15-acre site on which North of South will be built, valuing the property at $15 million. For tax purposes, though, the current assessed value of the 12 parcels set for development is $2 million.

• Buckingham is credited with a $7 million equity contribution. But that’s not money it put up. Rather, the sum represents the project’s development fees, which the company agreed to waive.

The company will be paid separately, out of municipal bond proceeds, for the project’s architecture and engineering costs and for construction management. Once North of South is complete, Buckingham will earn more cash by managing parts of the property. If the project revenue is insufficient to make debt payments, Buckingham will be on the hook for the first $6.9 million, backed by a personal guarantee from Buckingham CEO Brad Chambers.

• Buckingham could start cashing in profits from the project by selling individual components before taxpayers are paid back in full.

The hotel, office and apartment phases each are assigned a “base release price” at which the bonds for that portion are considered satisfied. For instance, the release price for an office component starts at about $2.4 million (and falls as payments are made on the bonds).

If the developer can sell that portion, it can pocket any profit above the release price.

A potential consequence of the arrangement is taxpayers could get stuck holding underperforming portions of the project while the developer cashes out of profitable ones.

Deron Kintner, executive director of the Indianapolis Bond Bank, said the city “increased the value” of various components to help guard against the risk.

“From Day One, when we started down this road, risk mitigation was of utmost importance to us,” he said.

• Taxpayers could be on the hook for building a multimillion-dollar parking structure for the adjacent WellPoint Inc. campus since the North of South project will remove some spaces and create more demand for existing ones.

The city is obligated to provide 2,000 free spaces to WellPoint as part of a 1997 agreement, expiring in 2012, that enticed the insurance giant to consolidate operations from the suburbs.

The North of South agreement suggests the city could pay Buckingham for use of some of the new spaces in the project or build a new garage at taxpayer expense. For reference, the North of South deal assigns a value of $12 million for its two parking garages and 800 total spaces.

Lilly is key

Lilly initially approached Buckingham in 2007 about putting together a redevelopment of the North of South properties.

The companies worked on the project for two years before approaching the city to request a $45 million subsidy to support it, Chambers said. City officials came back with an offer to act as a lender instead.

The decision came down to a philosophical question: Is it more prudent for the city to cap its exposure by investing a cash sum in a private development as it did with the JW Marriott and Conrad Indianapolis, or to put more money at risk for a chance to recover the full amount?

The city opted for the latter, giving Buckingham what amounts to a mortgage loan. Under the arrangement, after a two- to four-year period of construction and stabilization, the city will apply an estimated $2 million in property taxes and state income taxes on the North of South properties toward about $8 million in annual bond payments.

Buckingham will be responsible for paying the rest out of project revenue, Kintner said.

The city considered taking an equity stake but decided against clouding its role as lender, Kintner said.

He said the city would have had to contribute more to the project to earn equity.

Chambers noted his company’s equity in the deal is merely theoretical until taxpayers are paid back.

“We’ve got significant motivation and skin in the game to work hard on this project, and have for three years now,” he said in an interview. “We’re going to work very hard to make this successful. At the end of the day, the project and its merits are solid.”

Chambers said a successful deal would be “very profitable” for Buckingham, but he would not provide a number.

Kintner said it doesn’t matter how much Buckingham profits on the deal as long as the city gets a new amenity and taxpayers are paid back. The project simply would not have worked if the developers had to tap private credit markets.

“Our goal was to protect the city’s interest and to see the project built and financed in a way that’s most advantageous to the city,” Kintner said. “Buckingham is no less at risk than other developers who have borrowed to put money in projects—they borrowed $97 million; there’s an inherent risk in that.”

Public and private?

The city sold about $98 million in bonds to finance the project and will kick in another $9 million for infrastructure improvements. Add in a $6 million state grant, and taxpayers are on the hook for about $113 million.

The bonds will generate $86 million for the project itself; the rest will cover fees and pre-paid interest for the time North of South is under construction.

City officials say the big public investment helped leverage $37 million in private contributions to the project by Lilly and Buckingham, though that figure includes the city’s payment to Lilly and the $7 million equity awarded to Buckingham in lieu of development fees.

The plans call for 320 apartments, a 157-room conference hotel, 40,000 square feet of retail or office space, and 800 parking spaces. An $18 million YMCA branch also is planned, but its financing is separate from the city-supported deal.

“These are amenities a lot of corporations move to the suburbs to chase,” said Scott Travis, Buckingham’s senior development executive.

But Melina Kennedy, the presumptive Democratic challenger to Republican Mayor Greg Ballard, was surprised the incentive package didn’t come with any job-creation commitments or an opportunity for taxpayers to earn some return alongside the developer if the project succeeds.

“Certainly, the actual development itself will be positive for downtown, but I believe some of the negotiating on the city’s behalf wasn’t as aggressive as it should have been to protect the taxpayers,” she said.

One protection the authors of the plan included was hiring locally based Keystone Construction Corp. as the city’s agent in the deal to watch over Buckingham. Regions Bank, meanwhile, is administering the loan on the city’s behalf.

“The city is acting as the bank on this project—taking on roughly the entire project in terms of risk financing,” Kennedy said. “If it fails, it will be on the city’s shoulders.”

The flip side is, if North of South succeeds, the city gains an asset that could attract more young professionals and make downtown more walkable, said former real estate broker and developer Gus Miller, who now works for a pension fund adviser.

He sees it as a prudent gamble to keep up the momentum that appeared in a recent study of U.S. Census data: Between 2000 and 2009, downtown Indianapolis saw an 83-percent rise in the number of college educated residents ages 25 to 34.

And it helps when the risk involves a 27-year-old developer that manages more than 18,000 apartment units and has built 5,000 of its own. Buckingham also owns The Ambassador and Harness Factory Lofts apartment buildings downtown, and is developing The Avenue, a $25 million apartment and retail projectalong Indiana Avenue.

“We beat up people for pushing these kinds of things through,” Miller said of North of South. “You can build all kinds of sewers and roads, but at the end of the day, people like to live in communities. [The deal] is unorthodox, but we have to take risks to move forward as a community.”

Paying old debts

The North of South deal also settles a 20-year-old agreement between Lilly and the city that went expensively wrong for taxpayers.

City officials agreed in 1989 to vacate a portion of Kentucky Avenue and spend $36 million to widen surrounding roads to accommodate an expansion of the Lilly Technology Center.

The city sold bonds backed by property tax revenue on the property, but starting in 1997—thanks in part to a new round of abatements, Kintner said—the bond payments due exceeded the property tax payments, triggering an agreement for Lilly to cover the shortfall.

Lilly paid about $13 million toward the bond payments over the years, and would have been entitled to reimbursement from the city of the remaining balance after the original bonds were retired in 2020.

Instead, as part of North of South, the city opted to refinance the debt, paying off the remaining $15 million balance (including interest) owed to Lilly and forgiving the requirement that the company cover any shortfalls in bond payments. In exchange, Lilly agreed to reinvest the entire sum in North of South.

The upshot: Twenty years after building $36 million in road improvements, the city still owes $44 million. And it will continue making payments until 2024, unless a future mayor opts to refinance again.

Kintner doesn’t see a problem with taking 33 years to pay for road improvements since, he says, the point of municipal borrowing is to fund improvements with a long life.

In fact, Kintner said refinancing the bonds and paying Lilly now saves taxpayers $20 million. That’s because the city replaced bonds accruing interest at about 6 percent with new bonds at 3.5 percent.

Promises kept?

The 1989 agreement said Lilly was entitled to reimbursement only if it invested at least $168 million in improvements at its Technology Center along Harding Street. The company told the city in a March 1998 letter that its investments at the facility since Jan. 1, 1989, had totaled $357 million.

In 1999, the company announced a 10-year, $1 billion expansion in Indianapolis, a commitment Lilly spokesman Ed Sagebiel says the company also has met.

Yet during the North of South negotiations, Lilly was “doing cartwheels” to rid itself of its guarantee to cover bond payment shortfalls on the Harding Street project, Kintner said.

David Lewis, Lilly’s vice president of taxes, said the company hadn’t anticipated it would ever need to make the payments. He said “nothing comes to mind” on why the property taxes came up short of covering the bond payments.

“Assessed values used in the forecast and the ultimate values were different,” he said.

So did the city get enough in return for releasing Lilly from its obligation to backstop the bond payments?

“We negotiated with them for quite some time,” Kintner said. “Instead of a bonus to executives, they agreed to reinvest it into downtown.”

The payments between the city and Lilly seem murky to Christopher Steele, an economic development and site-selection consultant and president of Massachusetts-based CWS Consulting Group.

Steele applauds local governments that find creative ways to partner with developers after “sober reflection” to attain “broader public goals.”

But Steele, who reviewed the documents at IBJ’s request, described the agreements as “poorly negotiated.” He can’t quite understand how, if a company doesn’t pay enough property taxes to cover the bonds for its own infrastructure improvements, the city could wind up in arrears.

“There are very good and effective ways of structuring incentive and tax programs to build a strong and mutually reinforcing situation between company and community,” Steele said. “This is not one of them.”

He described the commitment that Lilly reinvest the proceeds in the North of South project as “trying to make a very bad deal better.”

Misplaced priorities?

Taxpayers are being fleeced, plain and simple, for a project that offers no clear benefit to the public, said Julia Vaughn, policy director for the government watchdog Common Cause Indiana.

If North of South really were such a certain success, the developers should have been willing to part with some of their own money to help finance it, she said.

“It really shows what the city’s priorities are,” Vaughn said. “We’re going to help out a private developer and one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world, yet we’ve got a second-rate public transport system, infrastructure is falling apart, neighborhoods have so many needs. But apparently the checkbook is open if you’re the right corporate citizen.”

The arrangement sounds like the deal between the city and the Indianapolis Colts that paved the way for Lucas Oil Stadium, said Gary Welsh, author of the cantankerous political blog Advance Indiana.

The city under former Mayor Bart Peterson credited the Colts with contributing about $100 million toward the stadium, but the claim was disingenuous at best: The team had simply agreed to waive the lease-termination fee on the RCA Dome in exchange for a state-of-the-art new stadium.

Welsh’s problem with deals like North of South is that they prevent property taxes collected downtown from going to anything other than new downtown projects, to the detriment of neighborhoods and schools.

“They always make those deals so complicated, deliberately so, to confuse people and make it seem like money is coming out of someone’s pocket that it really isn’t,” Welsh said.

But for Buckingham and Lilly, North of South makes perfect sense.

“It’s the deal of a lifetime,” said one local developer who would have bid on the project if given the opportunity. “I can’t imagine there would ever be anything like this again.”

CityWay breaks ground at Downtown site

January 19th, 2012

CityWay breaks ground at Downtown site

Written by Jeff Swiatek
jeff.swiatek@indystar.com
10:49 PM, Aug. 3, 2011|

City and business officials turned some ceremonial dirt Wednesday to mark the start of a $155 million hotel-retail apartment project Downtown.

The project also got a new name. Originally touted as North of South, the project will be called CityWay, said Brad Chambers, president of Buckingham Cos. of Indianapolis, lead developer and construction manager.

The groundbreaking for the city subsidized project drew a host of public and private-sector leaders, including Mayor GregBallard and Eli Lilly and Co. Chief Executive John Lechleiter.

The city floated $98 million in bonds to help finance the project, and Lilly is leasing the 14 acres of former parking lots where it’s being built.

From a tent pitched at South and Alabama streets, Chambers told a crowd of more than 75 people, including Indiana Pacers head coach Frank Vogel, that the project will be “a trend-setting model for urban living.”

Ballard said the coming of CityWay was one reason Rolls-Royce decided in March to consolidate 2,500 employees from several offices into a former Lilly office two blocks from South and Meridian streets.

“Without this project, that probably doesn’t happen,” the mayor said.

Shrugging off the impact of the weak economy, Chambers said the project has drawn strong interest from retail and restaurant tenants.

“We’re looking two to three years out, and hopefully the economy will be in a recovery mode” by the time the complex opens, he said.

CityWay will include a 157-room Dolce brand hotel, 320 apartments, retail and office space, two parking garages and a full-service YMCA. The complex will be finished in late 2012 or early 2013, except for the YMCA, which might not open untilThe mayor and City-County Council decided to sell bonds, backed by Downtown property tax revenues, to help finance the project, which they hope will spur development between Downtown and the Lilly corporate campus.

Political connections important in McCormick management

January 19th, 2012

Political connections important in McCormick management

By James Ylisela Jr. | CRAIN’S CHICAGO BUSINESS
Posted November 23, 2009

CHICAGO (Nov. 30, 12:30 p.m. ET) — The chief executive officer won his post after raising campaign cash for disgraced Gov. Rod Blagojevich. The just-departed human resources director owed her job to a powerful state senator. Other top executives have long ties to Mayor Richard M. Daley’s political machine.

That’s what clout looks like at the Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, known as McPier, a little-understood government entity that operates the city’s primary convention venue, the vast McCormick Place complex; the adjacent McCormick Hyatt Regency Hotel, and the lakefront tourist center Navy Pier.

But the defection of two major trade shows this month — including the NPE trade shows — and a deepening financial crisis raise questions about how well an agency run the Chicago Way can compete with more-efficient, warm-weather convention centers such as Orlando, Fla., and Las Vegas.

Crain’s Chicago Business, a sister publication to Plastics News, published this investigation of McPier in its Nov. 23 issue.

Financial trouble

Despite the high prices it charges trade groups to stage conventions at McCormick Place, McPier doesn’t make enough money to cover its operating expenses or payments on its debt.

Agency officials project operating losses will grow eightfold to $28.8 million in the fiscal year that started July 1. And the state of Illinois will have to fork over hundreds of millions of dollars in the years ahead to make up shortfalls in tourism taxes that were supposed to cover McPier bond payments.

These financial woes are particularly striking in view of McPier’s extraordinary fiscal powers and valuable assets. It has direct access to taxpayers’ wallets, collecting more than $100 million in taxes annually and borrowing $2.5 billion on the state’s credit. McPier generated $211 million in revenue in fiscal 2009, mostly from trade shows, tourist spending and hotel bookings. Some 2.3 million people attended conventions at McCormick Place, while 8 million visited Navy Pier.

“We expected to lose money this year,” says McPier Board Chairman John Gates Jr., a former real estate executive appointed to the post last month by Daley. “We just didn’t expect to lose this much.”

A slumping economy contributed to the expanding losses. And it’s widely acknowledged that labor costs at McCormick Place exceed those of competing venues. But a Crain’s investigation shows McPier has deeper problems all its own.

Compounding the operating losses is a mountain of debt brought on by its massive and, some say, overly aggressive financing of the McCormick Place West Building, which opened in 2007.

McPier expected money from taxes on hotels, restaurants, taxis and car rentals to cover annual debt service, which totaled $130 million in 2009. But those taxes never covered the bond payments — even during banner convention years in the middle of this decade — forcing the agency to drain a reserve fund and dip into the state’s general sales tax fund for the first time in 2009.

McPier tapped $18.8 million, and officials say they’ll need $34 million in sales taxes next year. The cumulative funding gap is expected to exceed $500 million by 2021, a sign the financing model for the $882-million expansion was fundamentally flawed.

Chicago’s chief convention rivals carry far less debt. Annual debt payments for convention centers in Orlando and Las Vegas are $74 million and $37 million, respectively.

The way out is uncertain. McPier’s credit is tapped out, which means it can’t restructure its debt and lower the payments without approval from the Illinois General Assembly. But refinancing legislation is caught up in Springfield’s political squabbles.

Without refinancing, the agency can’t stay competitive by building desperately needed hotel rooms or modernizing the oldest McCormick Place building, the Lakeside Center, which has become a financial drain.

Last week, Gates and his fellow board members took a step toward keeping their business competitive — and returning to profitability — by announcing a 20 percent cut in its 500 administrative staff positions through early retirements and layoffs. The cuts won’t take full effect for at least a year, and officials won’t say which positions will be eliminated.

McPier’s salaried positions, which include politically connected senior directors and managers, have actually increased in the past three years. But CEO Juan Ochoa says the cuts have everything to do with “right-sizing” during a recession and nothing to do with politics.

“Our payroll isn’t bloated,” he says. “I can’t speak to what happened before I got here. But we don’t hire that way today.”

McPier officials say the convention business is cyclical and that they will show a profit in 2011 and 2012, when major trade shows return to McCormick Place, producing more sales, hotel bookings and tourist dollars — and tax revenue.

They are considering improvements at Navy Pier to generate more revenue and are negotiating with labor unions to change restrictive work rules and high costs. And they’ll be lobbying the Legislature to give them some room to maneuver. Last week, they formed a task force to find ways to keep McPier competitive.

“We obviously have some problems,” Gates says. “We’re not saying we don’t. Everything is on the table, but we have to get our own house in order first.”
Can McPier stay viable without changing the way it funds itself? Can Chicago, a cold-weather city with a reputation for being difficult, still compete? And can the agency really kick its addiction to political clout for the sake of its own future?

All of this makes McPier a maddening contradiction, says Rob Hunden, president of Chicago-based Hunden Strategic Partners, a real estate consultancy that specializes in large convention, sports and entertainment facilities.

“It’s a matter of extremes. McCormick Place is big — the biggest convention center in the country — and it’s beautiful,” Hunden says. “Chicago is a fantastic destination. But then there’s the other extreme: onerous work rules, problems of running the place, political issues. Chicago is an all-pro city, but it has a team with problems.”

From bartender to $130,000 job

Tanya Navratil was looking for part-time work in 1994 when she dropped by the Bella Luna Café on North Dearborn Street, near her home, and asked owner Danny Alberga if he needed a bartender a few nights a week. A couple of introductions later, she met state Sen. James DeLeo, D-Elmwood Park, an influential legislator who has placed dozens in state jobs.

It’s not clear what role he may have played in Ms. Navratil’s hiring at McPier in 1996. But in 2003, he placed her name on Blagojevich’s infamous “clout list” to be the agency’s human resources director. She was making $130,435 before resigning last summer.

Navratil could not be reached for comment; DeLeo did not return calls.

A McPier spokeswoman won’t discuss Navratil’s qualifications. That’s part of the problem: McPier’s salaried workforce is really two payrolls — professionals with years of experience in the convention and tourism business and politically connected staffers with murkier credentials.

It remains to be seen which group will absorb more of the staff cuts McPier announced last week.

Crain’s examined three years of payroll lists supplied by McPier. The 2009 payroll lists 1,832 people. Of those, 1,510 are hourly workers, mostly plumbers, electricians and other union members who work the trade shows at McCormick Place. That leaves 322 salaried employees, about 17.5 percent of the workforce, who consume 30 percent of McPier’s personnel costs.

In all, the agency spent $96 million on salaries and benefits in 2008 — about 44 percent of its revenue. That’s far more than its chief competitors. Convention centers in Las Vegas and Orlando spend less than 20 percent of revenue on personnel.

McPier’s payroll has fluctuated in recent years, but the changes have come mostly from hourly and temporary workers: It employed 1,902 hourly workers in 2007. Those numbers climbed to 2,230 in 2008, when the West Building opened, and fell to 1,510 in 2009.

But in the same period, the number of salaried positions grew, to 322 from 301. The number of employees earning more than $100,000 also increased, to 54 from 48.

The two men at the top of the organizational chart reflect the professional and political sides of McPier’s payroll. General Manager David Causton, who earns $197,380, is a conventionindustry executive with 20 years of experience in Chicago and Baltimore. CEO Ochoa, at $195,000, owes his post to his close ties to Blagojevich.

Ochoa says he turned down Blagojevich twice before finally accepting the McPier post. “It’s important to have good relationships with the governor, the mayor and other elected officials,” he says. “My career has been about empowering the Latino community. I make no apology for that.”

No one gets hired at McPier because of politics, Ochoa says, but two of McPier’s three assistant general managers hail from the patronage-heavy 19th Ward on the city’s Southwest Side. James “Skinny” Sheahan is the brother of former Cook County Sheriff Michael Sheahan, whose service to Daley dates to 1981. James Sheahan served as the city’s director of special events from 1992 to 1998 before moving over to a $165,470 post at McPier.

The assistant general manager at Navy Pier is another 19th Warder with a familiar Chicago surname. Michael Degnan, son of longtime mayoral confidante and former state Sen. Timothy Degnan Jr., has worked at McPier since 1985 and earns $141,606.

McPier employs 32 senior directors of various departments, including Nonda Harris, the brother of former Blagojevich chief of staff John Harris, who draws a salary of $153,359 as senior director of development.

Nonda Harris, a former city aviation worker, shows up on the clout list of former Blagojevich fundraiser Chris Kelly, who committed suicide in September after being indicted on corruption charges. John Harris pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud earlier this year after agreeing to testify against Blagojevich at the former governor’s trial next year.

The salaried workforce is rife with supervisory titles. There are, for example, 47 managers and 10 assistant managers, 34 directors and 14 assistant directors, and 40 people who have the word “coordinator” attached to their job descriptions.

Harris and Degnan didn’t return calls to comment.

Citing his long service to the city and McPier, James Sheahan says, “I make no apologies for who I am. If there’s a penalty for being a Sheahan, I can’t do anything about that.”

The McPier spokeswoman declines to discuss specific employees but says the agency is committed to “building and maintaining a highly skilled workforce.”
Paying and playing at McPier Midwest Environmental Service Group used to dust Blagojevich’s office as part of its three-year cleaning services contract at the James R. Thompson Center. But the Chicago-based company didn’t pad the ex-governor’s wallet, and now Vice-president Gregory Heath wonders if it may
have cost him a contract at McPier.

In March, Midwest lost out to Chicago-based Globetrotters Engineering Corp. and Philadelphia’s Aramark Corp. for a five-year, $78-million housekeeping contract, even though Midwest’s bid was $20 million lower.

“I worked on that proposal for a year,” Heath says. “Why would you pay someone $20 million more when you have someone else qualified to do the work?”

Did campaign contributions make the difference? Heath doesn’t know, but says that’s one area where he can’t compete.

Globetrotters, which specializes in architectural and engineering services, has donated about $375,000 to various political candidates over the past 15 years, board of elections records show. The company gave $54,000 to Blagojevich alone. President Niranjan Shah kicked in another $16,000 to various candidates.

Globetrotters referred calls to Aramark. A spokesman for Aramark didn’t provide a response by press time.

Midwest, for its part, made a $1,000 contribution to the 26th Ward Democratic Organization in 2008.

McPier CEO Ochoa says the agency does not award contracts based on campaign contributions. Yet McPier contractors continue to pump out donations to state and local officials.

“We’ve certainly heard from Illinois businesses that feel if they want to compete for state contracts, they have to play in the campaign contributions arena,” says David Morrison, assistant director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform. “When you see someone make a huge donation and then get a tangible benefit, it sure looks bad.”

McPier has more than $1 billion in contracts outstanding. Vendors include big national corporations that distribute campaign contributions liberally. AT&T Inc., for example, gave $5.6 million to Illinois politicians in the past decade. The Texas company has McPier contracts worth $2.7 million.

Globetrotters’ partner, Aramark, is no stranger to the donation game either; the company has given more than $110,000 to Illinois candidates, including $7,000 to James Sheahan’s brother, former Sheriff Michael Sheahan.

Local companies big and small also contribute. AMS Mechanical Systems Inc. in Burr Ridge makes $150,000 a year providing refrigeration and other mechanical contracting services at McPier. State records show the company has donated $70,000 in the past decade — with $31,000 going to Blagojevich. Libertyville-based Aldridge Electric, recently awarded a McPier contract, has given $129,000, including $11,000 to Blagojevich.

AT&T and Aldridge didn’t return calls.

Thomas Kelleher, a vice-president at AMS Mechanical, says campaign contributions are a way to stay in the loop about upcoming projects. “Everything we’ve done has been bid competitively,” he says. “(Donating) is a way of getting to know people.”

Even would-be McPier contractors make campaign donations. McPier maintains a pool of 141 “qualified” vendors deemed capable of responding quickly to the authority’s needs. The vendors’ qualifications are approved in advance, but they still must submit bids to win contracts; deals worth more than $10,000 require approval by the McPier board.

Shah Engineering Inc. (which isn’t connected to Niranjan Shah) is qualified as a McPier vendor, even though the Chicago company pleaded guilty in 2007 to overcharging state and municipal entities about $5.5 million. After the conviction, McPier took work away from Shah Engineering but kept it on the qualified list. Vidyadhar Mohnalkar, McPier’s director of construction management, worked for Shah until 2006 — he joined the authority in July 2008.

Despite the recession, McPier’s spending on outside vendors is relatively unchanged. It spent $96.4 million on direct expenses in 2008 and $96.3 million in 2009 — $15 million more than it budgeted. Even the trimmed-down 2010 budget calls for $89.4 million in spending.

Gates called McPier’s procurement process “incredibly transparent” — so much so, he says, that “we’re often a difficult entity to bid for.”

The McPier spokeswoman says agency leaders are examining the contracting process to make it more open and easier to do business with McPier. “We encourage anyone and everyone to bid on (McPier’s) contracts.”

Midwest’s Heath still wonders what happened with his bid. “I guess it’s a cost of doing business,” he says of the campaign contributions. “Now everything’s turned upside down (at McPier) and they have to lay people off. We could have saved them a bundle.”

Conventional wisdom

NPE, held every three years, is one of McCormick Place’s oldest and biggest trade shows. In June, the 2009 show sponsored by the Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. drew 1,851 companies to exhibit in about 978,000 square feet of McCormick Place’s North, West and South halls. About 44,000 people attended from 120 countries.

Afterward, Crain’s sister publication Plastics News polled readers about whether the industry group should hold its 2012 convention in Chicago or Orlando. The Florida locale took an early lead in the online poll, but then hundreds of votes began pouring in for Chicago. After one week, 2,912 votes had been cast, and McCormick Place was the runaway winner.

Meghan Risch, public relations director for the Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau, McPier’s marketing arm, told Plastics News she had urged member companies, bureau staffers and McCormick Place employees to vote in the poll.

Stuffing the ballot box may be a Chicago tradition, but it didn’t save the convention for McPier.

Organizers of the plastics show, which has been in Chicago since 1971, last week chose Orlando for their 2012 event, after some exhibitors complained about high costs and burdensome work rules at McCormick Place.

Ron Kirscht of Minnesota-based Donnelly Custom Manufacturing Co. says in a blog post that he was angered by McPier’s online stunt, even though he voted for Chicago “with reservations about the shakedown and price gouging that is manifest for the exhibitors and conventioneers.”

McPier officials say they are addressing these issues. In September, they dismissed 100 of the 150 electricians who are under the authority’s control. Their message to the remaining 50 foremen: Whoever shows up to work at McPier had better have the right attitude.

“We need to improve the way we do business and focus on the customer experience,” McPier Board Chairman Gates says. “This will send a message to everyone else who works with us.”

Those changes didn’t come in time to save another major convention: the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. HIMSS is based here, and its owners feel a certain loyalty to their city after putting Chicago in their three-city convention rotation after Hurricane Katrina left New Orleans without a venue.

The medical trade show, which attracted 28,000 people this year and generates about $50 million in local spending, uses 1 million square feet of exhibit space, numerous meeting rooms for breakout sessions and pre-conference workshops and the entire Hyatt Hotel, HIMSS Executive Vice-president R. Norris Orms says.

But the group announced this month that it will leave for Las Vegas in 2012 after stops in Atlanta next year and Orlando in 2011.

The reason: a $200,000 bill from McCormick Place electricians.

Orms says his convention may return if McPier can get its prices in line with other venues: “Chicago is a wonderful town. We like the people. We just disliked the price.”

High prices have another big Chicago convention mulling over a move, the Chicago Tribune reported last week. A spokesman for the National Restaurant Assn., which brings more than 50,000 people and $86 million in spending to the city every year, told the Tribune its exhibitors “continue to be concerned about the costs of doing business in Chicago and at McCormick Place.”

Hotel accommodations are another weakness for McCormick Place. Orlando and Las Vegas have many more hotel rooms near their convention venues than Chicago, says Thomas Hazinski, an analyst at New York-based HVS Capital Corp. who has advised McPier on hotel expansion.

A lack of rooms near the convention center makes it harder to attract both mega-conventions and the smaller shows and meetings that are becoming the lifeblood of the industry.

“It’s a disadvantage for McPier, particularly for the smaller shows that would fit into the (new) West Building,” Hazinski says. “We’re competing with second-tier cities because they get (connected hotel rooms) in those cities. Even Milwaukee has more connected rooms than Chicago.”

Towns such as San Antonio, Indianapolis and Denver each have 4,000 hotel rooms connected to or very near their convention centers, says Hunden of Hunden Partners. The Hyatt has 800.

Gates doesn’t buy that notion.

“We don’t need more hotel rooms onsite. We need more hotel rooms in general,” he says. “With our dedicated bus lane, you can be downtown in seven minutes.”

Despite all the issues before them, Gates and Ochoa strike an optimistic tone about McPier’s future. Ochoa points to a $10-million incentive fund passed by the Legislature that the authority can use to offer better deals to potential trade show customers.

Gates promises a stronger promotional effort from McPier.

“We’re not very good at marketing ourselves,” he says. “We’re going to demonstrate that we’ve made some big changes.”